Filters Clear all
Pricing
API
Platform

code 11

AI code tools assist with writing, testing, reviewing, and debugging software across a broad range of programming languages and environments. The 344 tools here include IDE integrations, web-based coding environments, specialized tools for data pipelines, and platforms for non-developers building internal apps.

Lovable

assistants

Build full-stack apps by describing them in plain text

From $25 57 · 60,354 votes

CodeGPT by Judini

assistants

Code generation across multiple programming languages

Paid 42 · 59,194 votes

Axiom

assistants

Build browser automation without code

Paid 41 · 39,561 votes

Bricabrac AI App Generator

assistants

No-code web app generation with AI

Paid 37 · 32,817 votes

Autonoma

docs

AI testing for web and mobile apps

Paid 35 · 18,039 votes

BuildAI

assistants

Build professional AI apps and online businesses without coding

Paid 34 · 6,932 votes

HireNorm

assistants

Hiring platform for the AI era

Paid 32 · 64,808 votes

Duply

assistants

Automate image creation via API, URL, and forms

Paid 32 · 58,902 votes

Interview Coder

assistants

Real-time coding help for technical job interviews

Paid 31 · 30,511 votes

SampleFaces

assistants

AI-generated placeholder avatars for mockups

Paid 28 · 8,356 votes

Xoilac TV

assistants

Live HD football streaming across major global tournaments

Paid 27 · 4,602 votes

The category is wide and includes tools that serve very different audiences. Experienced developers typically want tools that integrate into their existing editor and support their specific language stack well. Teams may prefer tools with collaboration features, shared context, and audit logging. Non-developers building internal tools are better served by visual or low-code platforms like Dynaboard AI. Bug-fixing tools like FixThisBug.de focus on a narrow but high-value task. Code review and quality tools like GitRoll and Relicx focus on testing and reliability rather than generation. When comparing tools, practical benchmarks on your own codebase outperform general capability claims. Also consider how the tool handles context: tools with larger context windows handle full-file and multi-file edits more reliably. Security considerations include whether your code leaves your environment and under what terms it may be used to train future models.