Convictional
generalTeam communication platform replacing Slack
This category covers tools built around large language models: infrastructure for deploying, fine-tuning, evaluating, and monitoring LLMs in production. With 369 tools listed, it is one of the more technical categories on the site, aimed primarily at developers and ML engineers rather than end users.
Team communication platform replacing Slack
Fast AI transcription of audio and video
Generate and download AI-created songs instantly
Text-to-audio conversion with multiple languages and voice options
AI speech-to-text and tape transcription service
Persian keyboard, editor, and speech-to-text converter
AI audio transcription for multiple languages
Text-to-video and image-to-video AI
Elixir Phoenix SaaS templates and boilerplate
Video downloader for social media
Generate celebrity voices from text in seconds
Open-source UI toolkit for formatting LLM outputs as rich interfaces
Create professional infographics with an intuitive AI maker
Participate in AI competitions and benchmark models against thousands
Convert text prompts into scalable vector designs and illustrations
Read PDFs, Google Docs, Word files aloud with immersive text-to-speech
AI notepad that executes your tasks
GPU cloud infrastructure optimized for AI workloads
AI model comparison and evaluation
Cloud GPU platform with NVIDIA H100 for AI workloads
GPU instances for AI training and inference
Open-source GPT models for large-scale deployment
Open-source LLM for local or self-hosted deployment
Data management and labeling for LLM development
LLM tooling has exploded alongside the models themselves, and the category now spans several distinct problem areas. Deployment and serving tools like PeriFlow and Dstack help teams run models efficiently at scale. Evaluation and observability tools like UpTrain and AIWatch track model quality, drift, and cost over time. Memory and retrieval tools like Cognee add persistent context or RAG capabilities to LLM applications. When choosing, the key questions are infrastructure fit (cloud, on-prem, or hybrid), model compatibility (OpenAI-only vs. open-weight models), and whether the tool addresses your actual bottleneck, whether that is latency, cost, accuracy, or developer velocity. Pricing structures vary: some tools charge per token processed, others per seat or per API call. Open-source options exist across most sub-categories, which is worth considering for teams with engineering capacity to self-host.