AssemblyAI

transcripción

API de voz a texto con transcripción, resumen y análisis de audio

AssemblyAI es una API para voz a texto e inteligencia de audio. Los desarrolladores envían archivos de audio o audio en streaming a la API y reciben transcripciones con etiquetas de locutor, puntuación y marcas de tiempo. Más allá de la transcripción básica, la API ofrece resumen, detección de sentimiento, detección de temas y generación de capítulos, todo aplicado a…

55/100#93rankFree + $0.15/moVerified Jun 2026

Visit opens the official site · affiliate link, opens in a new tab

Pricing

Universal-3 Pro
$0.21/hour
  • Most accurate speech-to-text model
  • Supports multiple languages
Universal-2
$0.15/hour
  • Highly accurate
  • Trained on over 12.5 million hours of audio data
Voice Agent API
$4.5/hour
  • Fastest path to working voice agents
  • Built on Realtime Speech-to-Text API
Realtime Speech-to-Text API
$0.45/hour
  • Transcribe live audio with ultra-low latency
  • Best-in-class accuracy

Pricing from the official site, verified Jun 2026. Always confirm current prices on the vendor site.

Pros & cons Listof.Best analysis

Pros

  • API with speaker labels and timestamps
  • Offers summarization, sentiment, and topic detection
  • Usage-based pricing fits small and large workloads
  • SDKs for Python, JavaScript, and more
  • Free tier covers development and testing volume

Cons

  • Accuracy strongest for English; other languages vary
  • No listed third-party integrations
  • Primarily developer-facing, not a consumer UI

What users say Editorial summary

AssemblyAI is commonly used by developers who need to add speech-to-text and audio analysis to their own products without building the underlying models. A frequently noted strength is the breadth of audio intelligence features — transcription, summarization, sentiment, and chapter detection — available through a single API call. A common limitation is that accuracy is most competitive for English content, and the service is entirely API-driven with no consumer-facing interface.

Editorial summary based on public information — Listof.Best does not yet have enough verified user reviews to show a rating.

Best for: Developers building transcription or audio-intelligence features into applications

AssemblyAI vs Otter.ai

AssemblyAIOtter.ai
PricingFreemiumPaid
Price from$0.15/mo$19.99/mo
Free tierYesNo
APIYesWaitlist
Open sourceNoNo
PlatformsWebAPI
ModelsAssemblyaiOtter
Context window8k8k
Launched20172016
Languages99 languages
IntegrationsSlack, Zoom, Salesforce +8 more

Listof.Best analysis Compared with Otter.ai, AssemblyAI starts at $0.15/mo and offers a free tier.

Top alternatives to AssemblyAI See all alternatives →

Otter.ai

transcripción

Transcripción de reuniones en tiempo real con resúmenes automáticos y puntos de acción

From $19.99 59 · 46,076 votes

AI Transcriptions by Riverside

transcripción

Graba podcasts remotos con calidad de estudio y transcripción automática

Free From $29 55 · 50,731 votes

Jammable

transcripción

Crea versiones musicales con modelos de voz de IA

Free 42 · 43,722 votes

Audimee

transcripción

Conversión de voz con IA y creación de versiones musicales

Free 42 · 35,678 votes

Podwise

transcripción

Resúmenes, transcripciones y notas de podcasts

Paid 42 · 47,190 votes

Convert audio and video to text online for free

transcripción

Transcribe audio y vídeo a texto

Free 40 · 31,951 votes
Tags: Ai Audio Chaptering Audio Data Management Audio Moderation Circle Create React App Deep Information Technology Deep Learning

FAQ

How much does AssemblyAI cost?

AssemblyAI uses a freemium pricing model, with paid plans from $0.15/mo, and it offers a free tier.

Does AssemblyAI have an API?

Yes — AssemblyAI offers an API for integration.

What are the best alternatives to AssemblyAI?

Popular alternatives include Otter.ai, AI Transcriptions by Riverside, Jammable.

Verified Jun 2026

Specs

PricingFreemium
Price from$0.15/mo
Free tierYes
APIYes
Open sourceNo
PlatformsWeb
ModelsAssemblyai
Languages99 languages
Context window8k
Launched2017
Popularity rank#93