Otter.ai

transcripción

Transcripción de reuniones en tiempo real con resúmenes automáticos y puntos de acción

Otter.ai es una herramienta de transcripción de reuniones que se une automáticamente a las videollamadas y produce una transcripción de texto en tiempo real con etiquetas de hablante. Al terminar la reunión genera un resumen, extrae los puntos de acción y permite a los participantes buscar en la transcripción completa. El AI Meeting Agent se integra con Zoom, Google Meet…

59/100#40rankFrom $19.99/moVerified Jun 2026

Visit opens the official site · affiliate link, opens in a new tab

Pricing

Basic
Free
  • Automated AI meeting summaries
  • Unlimited meetings
  • Basic Integrations (Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, Slack)
Business
$19.99/monthly
  • 6000 monthly transcription minutes - 4 hours per conversation
  • Collaborative note editing
  • Import and transcribe unlimited audio or video files
  • & more powerful workspace and admin features

Pricing from the official site, verified Jun 2026. Always confirm current prices on the vendor site.

Pros & cons Listof.Best analysis

Pros

  • Real-time transcription with speaker labels
  • Auto-generates summaries and action items
  • Integrates with Zoom, Meet, and Teams
  • Searchable full transcript after the meeting
  • Broad integration ecosystem including Slack and Salesforce

Cons

  • No free tier — paid from $19.99/mo
  • API access on waitlist
  • Less reliable with heavy accents or background noise

What users say Editorial summary

Otter.ai is commonly used by teams that hold many meetings and need a reliable searchable record without manual note-taking. A frequently noted strength is the automatic summary and action item extraction, which saves time reviewing long recordings. A common limitation is transcription quality degrading on calls with significant background noise, strong accents, or dense technical jargon, and the absence of a free tier may deter low-volume users.

Editorial summary based on public information — Listof.Best does not yet have enough verified user reviews to show a rating.

Best for: Teams recording frequent meetings who need searchable transcripts and summaries

Otter.ai vs AI Transcriptions by Riverside

Otter.aiAI Transcriptions by Riverside
PricingPaidFreemium
Price from$19.99/mo$29/mo
Free tierNoYes
APIWaitlistYes
Open sourceNoNo
PlatformsAPIMobile App
ModelsOtterRiverside
Context window8k
Launched20162020
IntegrationsSlack, Zoom, Salesforce +8 moreSpotify, Apple, YouTube +1 more
Output formatsWAV, MP4

Listof.Best analysis Compared with AI Transcriptions by Riverside, Otter.ai starts at $19.99/mo.

Top alternatives to Otter.ai See all alternatives →

AI Transcriptions by Riverside

transcripción

Graba podcasts remotos con calidad de estudio y transcripción automática

Free From $29 55 · 50,731 votes

AssemblyAI

transcripción

API de voz a texto con transcripción, resumen y análisis de audio

Free From $0.15 55 · 59,024 votes

Jammable

transcripción

Crea versiones musicales con modelos de voz de IA

Free 42 · 43,722 votes

Audimee

transcripción

Conversión de voz con IA y creación de versiones musicales

Free 42 · 35,678 votes

Podwise

transcripción

Resúmenes, transcripciones y notas de podcasts

Paid 42 · 47,190 votes

Convert audio and video to text online for free

transcripción

Transcribe audio y vídeo a texto

Free 40 · 31,951 votes
Tags: Adobe Media Optimizer Ai Ai Content Tools Ai For Bu Ai For Business Workflows Ai For Collaboration Security Ai Transcription Ai-powered Content Creation

FAQ

How much does Otter.ai cost?

Otter.ai uses a paid pricing model, with paid plans from $19.99/mo.

Does Otter.ai have an API?

Otter.ai's API is available via waitlist.

What are the best alternatives to Otter.ai?

Popular alternatives include AI Transcriptions by Riverside, AssemblyAI, Jammable.

Verified Jun 2026

Specs

PricingPaid
Price from$19.99/mo
Free tierNo
APIWaitlist
Open sourceNo
PlatformsAPI
ModelsOtter
IntegrationsSlack, Zoom, Salesforce, Google Calendar, Google Meet, Google Docs +5 more
Context window8k
Launched2016
Popularity rank#40