Pricing
- Natively integrated AI Agent
- AI-powered Insights
- Self-improving system
Pricing from the official site, verified Jun 2026. Always confirm current prices on the vendor site.
Pros & cons
Our analysisPros
- Runs inside existing Intercom inbox, no extra vendor
- Pulls from help docs and conversation history
- Hands off to human agents with full context attached
- Integrates with Salesforce, Stripe, and Jira
Cons
- Requires an existing Intercom subscription
- Resolution quality depends on help content quality
- No free tier; usage-based pricing on top of Intercom plan
What users say
Fin is commonly used by support teams already on Intercom who want to deflect routine tickets without adding a separate AI vendor. A frequently noted strength is the seamless handoff to human agents with conversation context preserved, reducing friction at escalation points. A common limitation is that resolution rates are directly tied to the quality and freshness of existing help documentation, so teams with sparse content see diminished returns.
Editorial summary based on public information.
Best for
Intercom customers wanting to reduce ticket volume without a new vendor
Manually choose competitor
Fin by Intercom
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Price from | $0.99/mo | — |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| API | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Desktop | Browser Extension |
| Models | Intercom | Vanchat |
| Context window | 1M | 128k |
| Launched | 2011 | 2023 |
| Integrations | Salesforce, Stripe, Jira | — |
Top alternatives to Fin by Intercom
Verified Jun 2026
Specs
| Pricing | Paid |
|---|---|
| Price from | $0.99/mo |
| Free tier | No |
| API | No |
| Open source | No |
| Platforms | Desktop |
| Models | Intercom |
| Integrations | Salesforce, Stripe, Jira |
| Context window | 1M |
| Launched | 2011 |

